14 ms·
That's great and all, "training", "learning", etc. are terms of art. How does that change the fact that there is no substantial reproduction of the works in th
by srslack 3y ago
That's great and all, "training", "learning", etc. are terms of art.
How does that change the fact that there is no substantial reproduction of the works in the resulting weights, or in the "output" of these models with the weights?
Can you point to me where it's illegal to take copyrighted works and "train" neural networks on them, as long as there's no substantial reproduction of the works in the output of that process, or in the output of a particular configuration of "trained" and "frozen weights"?
- anileated 3y agoDoesn’t make it any less of an automatically created derivative work.