3 ms·
That's quite an argument. "Software is getting too hard to write, so we will do the work in hardware instead, since hardware is so much easier to develop." It
by jandrese 4y ago
That's quite an argument. "Software is getting too hard to write, so we will do the work in hardware instead, since hardware is so much easier to develop."
It's pretty ballsy of Intel's marketing department to so blatantly lie to your face like that. Maybe they were big believers of the "Big Lie" rhetorical device? If you say something so outrageous people are less likely to question it because you must be a genius with loads of inside knowledge to assert something so completely crazy on the face of it.
- ssrc 4y agoIn the late 70s to early 80s that wasn't an obviously wrong idea, especially because in the posts above, as I understand it, when they say hardware it mostly means microcode, which is more software than hardware. At that moment many architectures like the iAPX432, Lisp machines, Xerox machines, the VAX, etc. were microcoded.