> Very elegant, good job! Thanks! > Although I'm surprised there's no mention of REBOL or Red[1]. Very similar philosophy regarding constructs and keywords.

> Very elegant, good job! Thanks! > Although I'm surprised there's no mention of REBOL or Red[1]. Very similar philosophy regarding constructs and keywords. I am not too familiar with either language. It seems like we have very similar philosophical goals but with very different approaches. Red/REBOL are minimalistic but extensible with macros/homoiconicity, while qdbp is minimalistic but has a versatile object system and expressive syntax allowing many constructs to be built as libraries. I debated adding macros, but decided that qdbp was expressive enough as is and macros would probably double the complexity of the language.