I think the point is that you don't get to just declare what defines "hopelessly immoral". An argument could be made that inflicting drm on everyone who is not

I think the point is that you don't get to just declare what defines "hopelessly immoral". An argument could be made that inflicting drm on everyone who is not a theif, and all posterity long after any legal or moral copyright has expired yet the thing is still encrypted or broken, is hopelessly immoral. That comment did not prove you right.