> They’ve clearly used and reproduced his content Used? Yes. Reproduced? I don't think that necessarily follows. > I don’t know, but to claim that they’re jus

> They’ve clearly used and reproduced his content Used? Yes. Reproduced? I don't think that necessarily follows. > I don’t know, but to claim that they’re just storing a url is bogus. They're definitely not just storing an URL, but claiming that what they're storing is some kind of "copy" seems equally bogus.