4 ms·
"Last Highway Landing" -- not! Unless "of a commercial aircraft" is implied. Because a private plane landed on 280 (in the Bay Area) back in the 1980s. I actua
by AlbertCory 4y ago
"Last Highway Landing" -- not!
Unless "of a commercial aircraft" is implied. Because a private plane landed on 280 (in the Bay Area) back in the 1980s. I actually met the pilot who did it; his engine threw a rod and he was not going to get back to Palo Alto Airport.
Fortunately, a freeway has plenty of room, if there aren't cars on it.
- ledauphin 4y agohighway/road landings of small aircraft happen in the US on a pretty regular basis. the biggest risk is still probably power lines, not cars. a small aircraft landing on a road will be going about the same speed as highway traffic, so unless it's really busy, drivers will usually notice an airplane in front of them and have time to slow down.
- Turing_Machine 4y agoPeople land their bush planes on roads here in Alaska all the time. Often without authorization, true, but it still happens.
- CrazyStat 4y agoFrom the post: > Lastly, one other safety lesson which came from flight 242 may not have come about due to any recommendation or research project: among pilots, it seems that the crash permanently killed the idea of landing large airliners on highways. This Hollywood staple makes for good cinema, but in real life it usually ends in catastrophe — and while McKenzie and Keele were not the first to discover this, they were the last, as no passenger jet pilot has tried again since. I'm sure the author is aware that small planes still occasionally land on highways.
- genewitch 4y ago> killed the idea of landing large airliners on highways says so right there. The author explains stuff in a way for laypersons to understand. I actually prefer some of the imprecise "color" the author ads to his write-ups of crashes. as an aside i imagine the damage to the road surface (and probably subsurface) would be astounding.
- outworlder 4y ago> Unless "of a commercial aircraft" is implied. No - "large airliners" is specifically spelled out. Unless this private pilot was in a 737 or whatever, the statement is still true. Since you are talking about KPAO, it was definitely a small aircraft. GA aircraft land on highways often. The only reason that doesn't happen more frequently is that pilots are generally concerned about causing ground casualties. Usually what would prompt this would be an engine failure. A silent aircraft trying to land among high speed traffic makes for a dangerous scenario.
- AlbertCory 4y agoThe title is click bait. It doesn't say that. Is it an oversight? Well, I once used a title that was different from the title of the URL, and it got Flagged. Dang upheld the flagging. Now I know better.
- InitialLastName 4y agoThe title on HN is entirely different to the title on TFA: "Highway to Ruin: The crash of Southern Airways flight 242" In the interest of assuming good faith (as the guidelines suggest) we should assume the ambiguity is an oversight.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- cozzyd 4y agoMore recently a small plane landed on Lake Shore Drive: https://abc7chicago.com/lake-shore-drive-plane-crash-lands-on-lsd/3834885/ https://abc7chicago.com/lake-shore-drive-plane-crash-lands-o...
- dang 4y agoSubmitted title was "Last Highway Landing in USA". We've reverted the title now.