> Sure, but that's not a median. That's the intersection of people above 2 separate medians of 2 separate measures. And? That's a given. The comment we are dis

> Sure, but that's not a median. That's the intersection of people above 2 separate medians of 2 separate measures. And? That's a given. The comment we are discussing made it clear that the are multiple measures, and that most developers will fall below the median (in at least one of those measures). Not that difficult to understand. > You can't combine the median of separate measures Sure. Which is why nobody did. What are you trying to add with this strawman? If you are simply trying to refresh your memory of your kindergarten-level math classes, I'll chuckle for a minute over the foolishness of me thinking you were trying to have a discussion and leave you to it.