> So, if they don't want them linked to Again its not clear cut. the license could be something like: "you are able to view these images as part of this websit

> So, if they don't want them linked to Again its not clear cut. the license could be something like: "you are able to view these images as part of this website, anything else is prohibited" or "direct linking to these images is not allowed, these images are licensed only fir use as part of this website" or something along those lines. Now, enforcing that is pretty hard. I'm also willing to bet that he didn't make any such license. But to say its a clear cut legal slam dunk isn't correct.