3 ms·
Somewhat less coal. We are talking about 3 GW less nuclear in a Grid which draws like 50. And yes, that were only the last nuclear reactors. But a lot of them w
by _ph_ 3y ago
Somewhat less coal. We are talking about 3 GW less nuclear in a Grid which draws like 50. And yes, that were only the last nuclear reactors. But a lot of them would have had to be decommissioned anyway and there are still the problems of cost, especially of the nuclear waste etc.
A large part of these 3 GW will be replaced even in 2023 and that will continue through the years. The current plans aim for 80 renewables in 2030.
- illiarian 3y ago> We are talking about 3 GW less nuclear in a Grid which draws like 50. 6% > A large part of these 3 GW will be replaced even in 2023 0% of solar generation and 5% of wind generation will be replaced with what exactly?
- illiarian 3y agoI forgot to mention in the sibling comment: > in a Grid which draws like 50. Installed wind capacity in Germany is 65GW. Seems to be much higher than what grid demands. And yet, on April 15th it was producing only 5% of that. And solar was producing zero. Guess where the power to cover that came from? Even today on a reasonably windy day (at least in Hamburg where I am right now) wind production is at 20% capacity, solar at 36 capacity. Busy burning coal for 21% of electricity even on a windy day.
- Schroedingersat 3y agoYou sure are fixated on nameplate numbers for those renewables that replaced all of the nuclear fleet and a third of the coal fleet already.