> I ask because they're shockingly few. Only if you believe the official numbers about Chernobyl, which are worthless. The Soviet Union and later Russia was no

> I ask because they're shockingly few. Only if you believe the official numbers about Chernobyl, which are worthless. The Soviet Union and later Russia was not being transparent. > The safety argument isn't based on numbers, but on fear. Very well-founded fear, based on how bad nuclear accidents can be, how bad people suck at adhering to safety protocols when there haven't been accidents for a long time, and the possibility of such accidents even being caused intentionally.