I believe the AI stole that text from PR agencies with all the contradictions usually included in the lastest state of the art social media bullshit requirement

I believe the AI stole that text from PR agencies with all the contradictions usually included in the lastest state of the art social media bullshit requirements generator. You either have "meaningful" (aka mass appeal) interactions or diverse ones. Also contradicts the echo chamber point. You either have quality content, or content that can be qualified by "quality signals" (aka reiterations of proven content). It is no secret that social media tries to maximize engagement and that rage is more successful than harmony. There are plainly conflicting economic and social goals. The misinformation and fact-checking part is of course ridiculous as well. The content is worthless, it contains nothing. It doesn't even work as guidelines, because the content is wrong or just badly thought out. The article has fresher ideas.