5 ms·
It could use a (2019) in the title. Interesting, but not recent.
by harles 3y ago
It could use a (2019) in the title. Interesting, but not recent.
- irrational 3y agoDoes it matter for math articles? It’s not like the math has changed in 4 years.
- dylan604 3y agoSomething has to define when new math came to be /s
- mypornaccount 3y agoI double checked, 1+1 is still 2 in ios 16.3.1
- interestica 3y agoSometimes it's hardware https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug
- jagged-chisel 3y agoIn 16.4.1, you have the opportunity to make it 4.15% bigger.
- varjag 3y agoOn the other hand 1+2+3 is 24 in iOS 11.1
- edgineer 3y agoThere is an aspect of novelty when it comes to YouTube videos
- thrdbndndn 3y ago> Does it matter for math articles It matters for all the articles, so yes.
- irrational 3y agoBut, why does it matter for all articles? Is it just a blind rule, or can we apply it just when it actually makes sense?
- d0mine 3y agoThe year in the title means: it is so good, it is worth reposting here.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- laserbeam 3y agoIt has less to do with math, and more to do with the conventions of posting to HN where people expect dates for non-recent links. There's nothing wrong with them otherwise.
- bnegreve 3y agoThe convention exists because for most articles, publication year is an important piece of context. I'm not sure we have to blindly follow the convention when it isn't.