> First off: If you're going to reference something as a way of proving your point, without any other supporting evidence, please post a link. I really need to

> First off: If you're going to reference something as a way of proving your point, without any other supporting evidence, please post a link. I really need to post a link that Epic literally just lost the case to Apple when Epic argued the same thing? It was just discussed here yesterday. https://techcrunch.com/2023/04/24/apple-wins-antitrust-court-battle-with-epic-games-appeals-court-rules/ https://techcrunch.com/2023/04/24/apple-wins-antitrust-court... > Microsoft voluntarily changed their practices regarding IE and Teams in order to appease regulators during active litigation. Their practices regarding IE happened during the US v Microsoft that required MS be split, but was later appealed, and given the changes that happened in the meantime, the DoJ agreed to not seek to break up MS. That also never happened. There has never been a time since IE was bundled with Windows that it hasn’t been bundled. The DOJ did not “decide” to drop the case because MS stopped bundling IE. They lost on appeal and the new administration didn’t pursue it. > The Teams unbundling is actively You are linking to a “rumor”??? Did you read your own Wikipedia link? “ Rogers found in favor of Apple on nine of ten counts brought up against them in the case, including Epic's charges related to Apple's 30% revenue cut and Apple's prohibition against third-party marketplaces on the iOS environment.” > which is directly in-line with the changes made during the US v Microsoft lawsuit Those “findings” never happened in the US. Which version of Windows was not bundled with IE since 2000?