3 ms·
I’m not sure I understand your point then because the code in the article is definitely very bad OCaml which is what I have been trying to tell you from the sta
by WastingMyTime89 3y ago
I’m not sure I understand your point then because the code in the article is definitely very bad OCaml which is what I have been trying to tell you from the start.
- boxed 3y agoIt's very bad if a language community KNOWS something is very bad and they still allow that to be valid syntax. Like `if (x) break;` in Java/C/C++. It's VERY BAD. Not fixing your language is a big red flag.