3 ms·
.NET is ok, but the classes you make serializable generally aren't how you'd write a normal class, which is what I mean by "ergonomic." As far as I know, you ne
by rcme 4y ago
.NET is ok, but the classes you make serializable generally aren't how you'd write a normal class, which is what I mean by "ergonomic." As far as I know, you need your fields to be public for both reads and writes, and you need to write a separate constructor if you want to create the types programmatically. Go lets you serialize objects more-or-less how you'd write them without serialization, as does Kotlin.
- hakanderyal 4y agoRecord types introduced in C# 9 solves this. It's now as simple as record SomeData(string Name, int Id); Which gives you an immutable object, auto generated constructor, and some additional helpers to make life easier.