14 ms·
Your sampling is flawed then. If you're arguing for some quantum metric that could make me lose it, you're for some reason not providing the word "us" with the
by moate 3y ago
Your sampling is flawed then.
If you're arguing for some quantum metric that could make me lose it, you're for some reason not providing the word "us" with the same leverage which puts us into a situation we should just default to the literal definition of median since there's literally no way to prove (or disprove) your point.
But sure, you've proven you can buzzkill anything, so you win!
- randomdata 3y agoAs was said by the parent commenter (drewcoo) just before you placed your bet, because no measure is established, each evaluator is bound to have a different opinion of how to measure a developer, and as a result most developers are likely to fall below the median (according to someone's measure). There is no mathematical contradiction. Perhaps a misunderstanding on your part? Either way, the bet was lost. Time for drewcoo to reap the rewards.