2 ms·
Will a paper be more convincing? I think there's a book. Write the author and ask him.[1] But the simple and unambiguous explanation of galaxy cluster tidal for
by Maursault 3y ago
Will a paper be more convincing? I think there's a book. Write the author and ask him.[1] But the simple and unambiguous explanation of galaxy cluster tidal forces is devastating to Dark Matter Theory in regards to galaxy rotation curves. Why anyone is still talking about Dark Matter as a viable explanation for galaxy rotation curves likely has to do with the paradigmatic nature of science which resists any change, plus that there are myriads that have wasted entire academic and scientific careers on Dark Matter.
[1] alex@SensibleUniverse.net
- pfdietz 3y agoA paper would tell one the thing passed peer review, and also let us look for papers publishing rebuttals. If it sank without a trace in the refereed literature, that's a screaming red flag. I am very dubious the idea is correct. If objects at large distances from the galaxy center have these large relative velocities induced by external objects they wouldn't be bound to the galaxy.
- Maursault 3y ago> If objects at large distances from the galaxy center have these large relative velocities induced by external objects they wouldn't be bound to the galaxy. Right. Tides must be caused by something other than the Moon because it's just too far away. No, wait, large masses have do have an effect across large distances. There are no isolated reference frames without gravity. Galaxy clusters do orbit around their center of gravity. Would you like to know how many theories in theoretical physics been proven? Precisely none of them, including Dark Matter Theory. This dubiousness is specious and, fwiw, a bandwagon argument.