3 ms·
In case you don't click the links above: dang recognizes the tsunami of AI content and it's being downweighted. Some people complain about all the AI content, a
by justin_oaks 4y ago
In case you don't click the links above: dang recognizes the tsunami of AI content and it's being downweighted. Some people complain about all the AI content, and those complaints are tiresome too.
Thanks dang. It's good to know that 1) things are being done about it (even if it's not enough for some people), and 2) we'd be better off resisting our urge to complain.
- dang 4y agoSorry - I meant to add an explanation and got distracted. Thanks for doing it for me :) If anyone reads those links and still has a question I haven't answered there, I'd be happy to take a crack at it. It's a tricky situation because all of these things are true: (1) it's the biggest technological development in a long time; (2) there's way too much material about it, a lot of which is mediocre; (3) every user has a different threshold for what feels like 'too much' about it on HN.
- tmaly 4y agoI am glad that there is an effort to not down weight the new information. Some of the new research coming out is very interesting.
- theolivenbaum 4y agoYeah it's a tricky situation - I for once welcome all the articles, as it's hard to keep up with how much is changing on the space on a daily basis - so many new releases, models, open and closed source projects. It has been very informative to keep up with it by visiting HN! What I was surprised by putting this together was just how much similar content is posted here every day - just click on the "Similar stories" under each post on our site to see how almost any given topic has quite a lot of content! Makes one give value to the curation being done by users and mods here that avoid making this repetition too visible (and annoying) on the site!