3 ms·
Right, but not every "should" needs a law behind it. One must be mindful of how a law would be enforced, before creating it.. and if it makes sense in the conte
by steveBK123 4y ago
Right, but not every "should" needs a law behind it.
One must be mindful of how a law would be enforced, before creating it.. and if it makes sense in the context of consistency with existing law.
If blocking a constituent on Twitter is illegal, can they mute them? Must they leave their Twitter & IG DMs open? What about the absence of an account on a social media platform, is that allowed?
Are thy allowed to have a spam filter on their email inbox? Can they ignore "Spam Likely" flagged calls on their iPhone? Does someone in their office have to go to through the spam flagged items in iMessage & WhatsApp?
How many communication methods are they legally mandated to have openly available to constituents? Does each need to be enumerated in law?
- naasking 4y ago> How many communication methods are they legally mandated to have openly available to constituents? I'm going off of a hazy memory here, but if some means of communication or some venue hosting a representative is open to the public, it must be open to all, modulo restraining orders and the like.