3 ms·
I would add the following to your list: - Vizia https://github.com/vizia/vizia https://github.com/vizia/vizia - Freya https://github.com/marc2332/freya https:
by nicoburns 4y ago
I would add the following to your list:
- Vizia https://github.com/vizia/vizia https://github.com/vizia/vizia
- Freya https://github.com/marc2332/freya https://github.com/marc2332/freya
- Xilem https://github.com/linebender/xilem https://github.com/linebender/xilem
- Floem https://github.com/lapce/floem https://github.com/lapce/floem
- nu11ptr 4y agoI'm aware of those, but I don't consider those UI crates in the same way as gtk-rs. The best analogy I can come up with is I don't consider react or vue-js UI libraries either, but low level libraries that can be used to build a UI lib. I consider Material UI (which uses react) to be a UI lib, for example. In the same way, AFAIK these crates are much more concerned with inventing the best UI paradigm than they are at having a full set of widgets useful in creating business apps. TLDR; I think of these as low level crates, not high level UI crates. If that changes, they will be added to my watch list.
- nicoburns 4y agoIMO they're just less mature than the one's you've listed. I'd expect them to get all the bells and whistles in due course (assuming that the projects suceed in general).
- jcelerier 4y agoDo any of them have something remotely close to Gtk or Qt's Grid/TreeView widgets? That's the one thing that pretty much 99% of the software I've worked on have needed at some point