Well, I am more than interested in your piece of work. If your are able to use the SOC hardware services (USB(device)/dma, timer interrupts, GPIOs,etc) with th

Well, I am more than interested in your piece of work. If your are able to use the SOC hardware services (USB(device)/dma, timer interrupts, GPIOs,etc) with the C906 without convolution (aka without E907 involvment which would be shutdown as I said in my previous post), I really want to know. Is there a place I can check for that? RISC-V, if successful, is the signal of the start of the "assembly era" (probably with high level interpreters written in assembly, like python/lua/javascript/ruby/gnagna). In this era, we will have to fight SDK complexity, like the abuse of complex macro languages. Personnaly, I currently write x86_64 assembly with a "very cheap" SDK (this is EXTREMELY important): I conservatively use a C preprocessor (currently the one from tinycc) to define an "intel like" syntax which allows me to assemble simple "intel like" syntax source files with fasmg or/and nasm/yasm or/and binutils as. I still use binutils ld though, but I keep in mind I may move away from it so I try to reduce my usage of its comfy complexity as much as I can in a point in time (the real issue is actually ELF...).