4 ms·

Can some one test fizzbuzz, sounds silly tho a lot of models fail on the combination check in my tests.

by amrb 3y ago

krasin 3y ago
Q> Write a FizzBuzz problem in COBOL A> Sure, here is the FizzBuzz problem in COBOL: IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. FIZZBUZZ. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 COUNT PIC 9(02). 01 MESSAGE PIC X(08). 01 BLANK PIC X(01) VALUE SPACES. PROCEDURE DIVISION. INITIALIZE. MOVE 1 TO COUNT. PERFORM UNTIL COUNT > 100 EVALUATE COUNT WHEN 3 MOVE "Fizz" TO MESSAGE WHEN 5 MOVE "Buzz" TO MESSAGE WHEN 3 AND 5 MOVE "FizzBuzz" TO MESSAGE WHEN OTHER MOVE COUNT TO MESSAGE END-EVALUATE DISPLAY MESSAGE ADD 1 TO COUNT END-PERFORM. GOBACK. This program prints the numbers from 1 to 100. However, for multiples of 3, it prints "Fizz" instead of the number. For multiples of 5, it prints "Buzz" instead of the number. And for multiples of both 3 and 5, it prints "FizzBuzz" instead of the number. Here is an example of the output of the program: 1 2 Fizz 4 Buzz Fizz 7 8 Fizz Buzz 11 Fizz 13 14 FizzBuzz 16 17 Fizz 19 Buzz Disclosures: 1. I work for Google, but not on Bard. 2. I don't know COBOL. Would be good if someone can check if the code is legit. I get a feel that it checks for the numbers to match (3, 5), not be divisible by 3 and 5.
- jiggawatts 3y ago
  It's obviously wrong, it's not using the modulo function anywhere or any such construct. It'll print text only for '3' and '5', and then numbers from then on. By the way, GPT 4 when asked to critique this listing immediately found the problem, and produced a corrected version as a bonus. Bard feels like GPT 2 to me. Even GPT 3.5 can solve COBOL FizzBuzz correctly. PS: Just to check that GPT 4 is understanding the problem and not just regurgitating something it saw, I asked it to solve the problem in different ways, such as unrolling the loop or avoiding the use of the MOD function. It can do that too.
  - igravious 3y ago
    Bard is garbage compared to GPT-4
  - nr2x 3y ago
    Yeah, that’s one of my favorite hidden features of GPT-4, if it gives me a function that doesn’t really fit my coding style I’ll tell it how I’d like it and it will adjust.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

Can some one test fizzbuzz, sounds silly tho a lot of models fail on the combination check in my tests.

by amrb 3y ago

Can some one test fizzbuzz, sounds silly tho a lot of models fail on the combination check in my tests.

Q> Write a FizzBuzz problem in COBOL A> Sure, here is the FizzBuzz problem in COBOL: IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. FIZZBUZZ. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 COUNT PIC 9(02). 01 MESSAGE PIC X(08). 01 BLANK PIC X(01) VALUE SPACES. PROCEDURE DIVISION. INITIALIZE. MOVE 1 TO COUNT. PERFORM UNTIL COUNT > 100 EVALUATE COUNT WHEN 3 MOVE "Fizz" TO MESSAGE WHEN 5 MOVE "Buzz" TO MESSAGE WHEN 3 AND 5 MOVE "FizzBuzz" TO MESSAGE WHEN OTHER MOVE COUNT TO MESSAGE END-EVALUATE DISPLAY MESSAGE ADD 1 TO COUNT END-PERFORM. GOBACK. This program prints the numbers from 1 to 100. However, for multiples of 3, it prints "Fizz" instead of the number. For multiples of 5, it prints "Buzz" instead of the number. And for multiples of both 3 and 5, it prints "FizzBuzz" instead of the number. Here is an example of the output of the program: 1 2 Fizz 4 Buzz Fizz 7 8 Fizz Buzz 11 Fizz 13 14 FizzBuzz 16 17 Fizz 19 Buzz Disclosures: 1. I work for Google, but not on Bard. 2. I don't know COBOL. Would be good if someone can check if the code is legit. I get a feel that it checks for the numbers to match (3, 5), not be divisible by 3 and 5.

jiggawatts 3y ago
It's obviously wrong, it's not using the modulo function anywhere or any such construct. It'll print text only for '3' and '5', and then numbers from then on. By the way, GPT 4 when asked to critique this listing immediately found the problem, and produced a corrected version as a bonus. Bard feels like GPT 2 to me. Even GPT 3.5 can solve COBOL FizzBuzz correctly. PS: Just to check that GPT 4 is understanding the problem and not just regurgitating something it saw, I asked it to solve the problem in different ways, such as unrolling the loop or avoiding the use of the MOD function. It can do that too.
- igravious 3y ago
  Bard is garbage compared to GPT-4
- nr2x 3y ago
  Yeah, that’s one of my favorite hidden features of GPT-4, if it gives me a function that doesn’t really fit my coding style I’ll tell it how I’d like it and it will adjust.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]