4 ms·
I'm curious about this, in the plugins section: Do: BarkBytes plugin for ChatGPT BarkBytes ChatGPT plugin Don’t: BarkBytes plugin for OpenAI BarkBytes plu
by NameError 3y ago
I'm curious about this, in the plugins section:
Do:
BarkBytes plugin for ChatGPT
BarkBytes ChatGPT plugin
Don’t:
BarkBytes plugin for OpenAI
BarkBytes plugin compatible with ChatGPT
BarkBytes plugin works with ChatGPT
BarkBytes plugin integrated with ChatGPT
A plugin is basically just an API that the provider allows ChatGPT to access, and a specification of that API. There's no reason you couldn't allow other non-OpenAI models to use your plugin too. Is OpenAI saying plugin providers -must- refer to their plugin as ChatGPT-exclusive, even if it's not?
- preommr 3y agoYea that's weird. I can underestand rules to avoid things like "OpenAI Barkbytes Plugin", but Barkbytes plugin compatible inegrated with ChatGPT seems fine.
- hombre_fatal 3y agoThey're talking about "BarkBytes plugin" (for ChatGPT), not "BarkBytes" the service nor BarkBytes plugins for any other service. When you have a "plugin", you've developed software that plugs into something. They're telling you how they'd like to be referred to when you build a plugin for ChatGPT. They don't care how you phrase "BarkBytes Safari plugin", "BarkBytes plugin for Garmin", or whatever.
- ronsor 3y ago> BarkBytes plugin compatible with ChatGPT > BarkBytes plugin works with ChatGPT > BarkBytes plugin integrated with ChatGPT Aren't these three just literal statements of fact, in the same way one might say "XYZ app works with iOS"?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- int_19h 3y agoIf you look at what the "API" is, it's basically "write one and ChatGPT will figure it out". None of it is really ChatGPT-specific, so any plugin is compatible with other LLMs pretty much by definition.