3 ms·

I can't speak for everyone, but I know quite a few who prefer the SASS port over less-bootstrap-rails (bootstrap-sass)

• te_chris 15y ago
  Completely agree, though LESS is nice, I think it would be best for people to be kept within rails "standards" (for want of a better term) which at the moment means SASS. There's also the whole "having to maintain a JS stack" that less necessitates as well, which would be better to leave well alone for beginners I think.
• mhartl 15y ago
  Thanks for the input. This is very helpful.
• ryan_f 15y ago
  I went the less port because it was being upgraded quicker with the 2.0 release. I've used both and they are both great gems. Both function pretty similar so don't be afraid of the LESS version, its still supported in the assets pipeline!
• geoffroy 15y ago
  Which SASS port do you prefer ? https://github.com/thomas-mcdonald/bootstrap-sass https://github.com/thomas-mcdonald/bootstrap-sass or https://github.com/yabawock/bootstrap-sass-rails https://github.com/yabawock/bootstrap-sass-rails Thanks in advance!
  • tylerlh 15y ago
    bootstrap-sass most definitely. Support for Bootstrap 2.0 was included very quickly (there was a development branch even before the main release)
    • geoffroy 15y ago
      thanks!