No. > The publication also wrote that "deteriorating street conditions around drug use," as well as "crime near the grocery store," were the cited reasons for

No. > The publication also wrote that "deteriorating street conditions around drug use," as well as "crime near the grocery store," were the cited reasons for its temporary closure. So you’re arguing that “high theft”, while being the stated reason that the store cut its hours last October, wasn’t specifically mentioned using those exact words in this store closing, and so that’s a victory? Even tho the stated reasons were “deteriorating street conditions around drug use” and “crime near the grocery store”? Lmao guess you showed those SF haters!