I like this article. I buy the argument that this is a bad precedent. But I have a criticism: >...But the present generation is more preoccupied with “misinfor

I like this article. I buy the argument that this is a bad precedent. But I have a criticism: >...But the present generation is more preoccupied with “misinformation” and, therefore, more focused on protecting society from the media. Since the First Amendment forbids legislating against press freedoms, the courtroom is the most promising venue for rolling them back. Fox is only the first company to be swept up in this reaction. Its like the writer is living in the 90s, somehow ignoring the algorithmic misinformation wave drowning outlets like that very magazine.