3 ms·
I'm sure that's fair use, and not theft, because the Gray Lady doesn't do such things, and you're vile for even suggesting it. But seriously, yes, sue. And off
by meepmorp 15y ago
I'm sure that's fair use, and not theft, because the Gray Lady doesn't do such things, and you're vile for even suggesting it.
But seriously, yes, sue. And offer to settle if Bill Keller prints a front page apology that makes note of the disconnect between his self-righteousness on the topic of copyright violation and his paper's (apparent) willingness to engage in it when it suits them.
- AndyNemmity 15y agoSarcasm isn't needed here. This place has been great because people say what they mean. You said "I'm sure that's fair use, and not theft, because the Gray Lady doesn't do such things, and you're vile for even suggesting it." Which could have easily been, "I don't think that's fair use, and believe it's theft." The rest I don't even know how to unparse because it's not particularly useful. Are you saying everyone does it? Are you saying the New York Times vilifies anyone who argues they don't? Are you saying other people vilify others that don't? Sarcasm is a way to say very little, and just be cynical with no justification. It's not adding anything to the discussion.
- meepmorp 15y agoOh, eat a dick you, pretentious scold. Your comment wasn't even meant to add something to the discussion, just gratify your ego, and worse, is dishonest in the way it does so.