3 ms·
Isn't there a difference between a monkey taking a picture (no human author involved) and a person using a tool (ChatGPT) to help them realise their original wo
by AlecSchueler 4y ago
Isn't there a difference between a monkey taking a picture (no human author involved) and a person using a tool (ChatGPT) to help them realise their original work?
If I made a drawing with one of those old plastic spirograph tools I'd never wonder if the copyright was mine or the spirograph's.
- stonemetal12 4y agoSure, even though photos are machine made, Humans claim copyright because they had artistic input on composition and framing. Between fully AI generated stuff, and human artistic input prompts causing output there is a line where the results go from copyrightable to not copyrightable. The question is where is that line, legally. To me GPT is either very close to or already crosses that line.
- AlecSchueler 4y agoI feel like I have to wrestle with GPT to get the output I'm imagining a lot more than I ever have done with a camera.