3 ms·
> A source familiar with the situation told Axios that the firing was not part of the settlement agreement. https://www.axios.com/2023/04/24/tucker-carlson-fox
by brucethemoose2 4y ago
> A source familiar with the situation told Axios that the firing was not part of the settlement agreement.
https://www.axios.com/2023/04/24/tucker-carlson-fox-news-out https://www.axios.com/2023/04/24/tucker-carlson-fox-news-out
In spite of that scoop, they are speculating that Carlson is too much of a legal liability in other pending suits.
That makes a lot of sense. Tucker's liability risk is basically a know fact with all the public information out there. I think this is the Occam's Razor explanation.
- swader999 4y agoNo definitely wasn't. Tucker never gave much credence to the dominion angle on the election either. And Blackrock owns a decent portion of fox and dominion too so it's all pretty silly in the monetary angle. Dominion was just a fifty million company a while back when it was acquired, now they deserve 1.6 b or half that in damages??? How exactly...