I believe it's different because the law about trespassing doesn't say anything about effective locks or other methods of denying access. AFAIK it would be ille

I believe it's different because the law about trespassing doesn't say anything about effective locks or other methods of denying access. AFAIK it would be illegal to enter even if there was no door at all. I don't think the linked case tried to challenge anti-circumvention provision using the reasoning I've given but it would be interesting to know if anybody else tried it :)