3 ms·
I'm sure most everyone on HN has read it already, but "What Colour are your bits?" http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23 http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23 is always
by gmaslov 15y ago
I'm sure most everyone on HN has read it already, but "What Colour are your bits?" http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23 http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23 is always a good reference in this sort of discussion. The system you mention sounds like what the Colour essay is railing against; trying to create a mathematical solution to a problem which is rooted in the law, and cannot be resolved by mathematical manipulations, but only by legal manipulations.
Do you recall the title or author of that paper? I'd be interested in reading about the contradiction argument you mention.
- JoshTriplett 15y agoI like that article as well, insofar as it helps both sides understand each other better, rather than continuously talking past each other. In order to do so effectively, that article pointedly avoids taking a position on the issue. However, the article also doesn't suggest that people shouldn't hold a position on that issue. I personally feel comfortable taking the position that anyone claiming that bits have color has an objectively wrong view of reality. I don't think that position needs much advocacy, though; reality always tends to win in the long term. It could certainly use a little help sometimes, though.
- icebraining 15y agoI think parent is talking about Monolith[1], which in fact that article specifically references: I think Colour is what the designers of Monolith are trying to challenge, although I'm afraid I think their understanding of the issues is superficial on both the legal and computer-science sides. (...) [1]: http://monolith.sourceforge.net/ http://monolith.sourceforge.net/
- william42 15y agoThe followup "Colour, social beings, and undecidability" http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/24 http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/24 is also pretty good.