4 ms·
> > assuming I'm an idiot with no experience > That's what you're trying hard to look like, unfortunately; if you're not, then stop. I encourage you to take a
by kerkeslager 4y ago
> > assuming I'm an idiot with no experience
> That's what you're trying hard to look like, unfortunately; if you're not, then stop.
I encourage you to take a deep breath and consider how you would like to treat people before you make future comments on the internet. Perhaps it's unwarranted optimism on my part, but I would guess you want to behave better than this.
I've responded in other comments to everything else you said in this post. You're not saying anything which hasn't been said more kindly by other people in this thread.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- kazinator 4y agoPlease don't plant booby traps in discussion. When I mention in a posting the topic of whether or not I'm an idiot and such, that's a signal to people that it's safe to debate that in whatever way they want. (I've been an idiot here and there, and may not be done. I could dig up objective evidence of that and expect people to agree.) > I've responded in other comments to everything else you said in this post. Maybe, but not to the message between the lines. Your position can be summarized as "everything is subjective and relative; my negative experience with a tool or technique speaks to the topic in a equally valuable way as do successful experiences by people making something reliable, tested, documented and maintainable by someone other than its author". That strikes me as objectively untrue, and conductive toward coming to casually dismissive conclusions. "Well, I think Rust is unproductive (at least for me) because I couldn't figure out the insane compiler messages. But some people who have never seen a type are struck by the novelty. That's okay, 'I like it' is perfectly valid. Everyone's experience is equal!"