5 ms·
Got it down to 70 MB with lrzip. Any better?
by haakon 15y ago
Got it down to 70 MB with lrzip. Any better?
- Mithrandir 15y agoI got 68.2MB with xz. (Whoa, 1.8MB difference...)
- cinch 15y ago68MB with "xz -9 --extreme" :P
- schiffern 15y ago70841044 bytes (67.56 MB) by running it through "sort" first. Bonus: it's in chronological order.
- allisfine 15y agoit's in sort-of chronological order originally (partially ordered is the correct term, I guess?) but not 100%
- schiffern 15y agoI don't know how it was ordered originally. I imagine just whatever order the scraper returned data. putting it throughs sort ordered by tpb's id, which I imagine are assigned in chronological order. The low-numbered torrents seem to be from 2004.
- dmn001 15y ago67.8 MB with 7-zip LZMA2 64MB dict, 273 word size, 8 threads
- jeremysalwen 15y ago58858381 bytes (57 MB) with nanozip nz -cc -m1.8g
- kokey 15y ago0MB with rm