5 ms·
A look at some of their financials has the trading at 32 times earnings where Apple trades at 28 and Coca-Cola trades at 29. So for luxury that doesn’t seem too
by quags 3y ago
A look at some of their financials has the trading at 32 times earnings where Apple trades at 28 and Coca-Cola trades at 29. So for luxury that doesn’t seem too high and from the list I have heard of a number of their brands. There is certainly value in a brand name, which is why I used two examples of other known brands in other industries. This lvmh company though is also growing at almost 20% per quarter. My guess also is during a mild recession luxury goods tend to hold up. While I wouldn’t buy it myself because I know nothing of luxury goods based on the businesses I see listed not all in clothing which I had assumed I would say the brand names may not be as significantly valued as one might think.
- capableweb 3y ago> My guess also is during a mild recession luxury goods tend to hold up. Not sure about this. Luxury goods stocks are famously cyclical, and tends to be something people drop quickly if they cannot afford during business downturns, as other more vital purchases takes preference. At least compared to stocks for big general stores etc.