3 ms·
Yeah, it just sounds like negative spin to me. It should be obvious really that a Tesla with unlimited supercharging would need a higher trade-in value than on
by chippiewill 4y ago
Yeah, it just sounds like negative spin to me.
It should be obvious really that a Tesla with unlimited supercharging would need a higher trade-in value than one without. If you want those owners to buy a new car you need to offer them more than those without the unlimited supercharging.
- c0m 4y agoNegative spin? The editorialising of it is reasonably nuanced, even going so far as to point out that customers “[might not] have to trade in [their] older Model S or Model X vehicle when taking this offer”, and calling the offer ‘interesting’. Really hard to see this as anything other than at worst neutral.
- shaftway 4y agoWe can also assume that Tesla will remove the free unlimited supercharging from these models and then re-sell them on he market. If I wanted to trade in my Model S with unlimited supercharging, I'd sell it on the used market and use that as a premium to get more for it.