4 ms·
By analogy, would the art of a photograph consist only of the location and orientation of the camera at the time it was taken?
by OscarCunningham 3y ago
By analogy, would the art of a photograph consist only of the location and orientation of the camera at the time it was taken?
- eqvinox 3y agoIn a way, yes. But both for a photograph as well as AI-generated art, you'd want (or even need) to show you can in fact execute it. That's where the actual result comes together. (There's also slightly distinct terms to throw around here, art, artwork, creative spark, …) The problem with most "AI art" is that it has absolutely no visible creative spark. It's entirely possible to create art with AI, just — millions of random images or text aren't it. (btw: I'm trying to explain the understanding of "art" as it is [fuzzily] agreed upon by people active in the field. I may be getting things wrong, or explaining them badly. Of note, however, is that this isn't "just my personal opinion", I'm trying to convey an existing consensus of that field.)