2 ms·
Having watched the discussion here for the past couple of days, I agree with frozenwind's comment. I wrote my own reflection here (the last comment): https://a
by jruohonen 4y ago
Having watched the discussion here for the past couple of days, I agree with frozenwind's comment. I wrote my own reflection here (the last comment):
https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/a-misleading-open-letter-about-sci/comments https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/a-misleading-open-letter-a...
Regarding impacts upon academia, I wrote two comments here:
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/04/12/guest-post-gpt-3-wrote-an-entire-paper-on-itself-should-publishers-be-concerned/ https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/04/12/guest-post-gp...
I'd also like to emphasize that it is not only about open source LLMs. I haven't followed the situation myself, but some sources say that LLMs are being developed also in the dark web, and who knows what kind of content the criminals there possess? (Borderline cases like NoiseGPT are already done openly.) Given the current geopolitical situation, the same goes for nation states. Fun times ahead indeed.
- rysertio 4y ago> who knows what kind of content the criminals there possess? As a person who regularly browses darknet forums, let me tell you, the text contents there are almost identical to any web forum you find on the internet.
- jruohonen 4y agoI don't browse the dark web so I cannot make a solid first-hand counterargument. But I seriously doubt your comment, given the amount of illegal material there, including most of the dumps from the thousands of past data breaches. Even if your comment is true regarding text content, it is almost certain that also they will try to capitalize on LLMs for improving their cyber crime codebases.