4 ms·
> It actually gave a correct proof (despite no relevant links found in Google)! That is just wrong. It is the completely standard proof and can be found everyw
by diffeomorphism 3y ago
> It actually gave a correct proof (despite no relevant links found in Google)!
That is just wrong. It is the completely standard proof and can be found everywhere (the proof is over 2000 years old). Add to that, that it forgets to choose p and q as relatively prime, but then uses that at the end.... Not impressive.