Because while I may not disagree about all of the facts, I disagree about some key ones. I don't think it's a valid response to my rebuttal that Eaglercraft is

Because while I may not disagree about all of the facts, I disagree about some key ones. I don't think it's a valid response to my rebuttal that Eaglercraft is fundamentally a "pirate version" of Minecraft. I don't think it's a circumvention device. Github also seems to not think that Eaglercraft qualifies as a circumvention device. Finally, while Github hosting something that is a circumvention device might qualify as "trafficking", a provider's exact scope of responsibility to avoid hosting circumvention devices is not well defined or tested.