8 ms·

As an AI Language Model

249 points by LeoPanthera 4y ago

visarga 4y ago
> As an AI language model, I haven't actually used an aquarium light myself. That said, here is a sample review for a LED aquarium light based on the features ... Direct Google search link to find the fake Amazon reviews: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Famazon.com+%22as+an+AI+language+model%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Famazon.c... It would be interesting to see an "as an AI language model" dataset with all the pages where it appears and the commentary around it. Search engines report millions of matches.
BulgarianIdiot 4y ago
And now we truly know why GPT insists to say "as an AI model" when we break a rule. It's precisely this. Like a signature, so we find it out in the wild when it's abused.
- courgette 4y ago
  I try really hard to prompt it to replace it with something else. It acknowledges and agree to it. Did it maybe once or twice, then reverted back to the old “As a AI model” IIRC, I was trying to see if it could replace by “as a LLM”.
  - titaniczero 4y ago
    It’s probably provided as system instructions for rejecting things. You can use the API and feed it with different instructions with the system role
    - Uehreka 4y ago
      I kind of wonder if maybe they look for certain words in the output (or run it through some sort of sentiment analysis) and if it fails they submit the prompt again with a very strongly worded system prompt (after your prompt) instructing it to reject the command and begin with the phrase “As an AI language model”. Like, I haven’t heard about a way they could actually implement filters this powerful “inside” the model, it feels like it’s probably a less elegant system than we’d imagine.
      - circuit10 4y ago
        They use RLHF (reinforcement learning through human feedback) which means they can reward it when it does it and punish it when it doesn’t They’ve probably done it strongly enough that it can’t really not do it, maybe on purpose to prevent misuse
  - IIAOPSW 4y ago
    My attempt was to substitute it with "speaking as a mother".
  - corobo 4y ago
    I realise you want to do it using the prompt but wouldn't it be easier to `output.replace("As an AI language model, ", "As a totes sentient robot, ")`?
    - courgette 4y ago
      I was just playing with it, checking if I could give him instructions that would span several prompts and what not. I try to make it play a games with me and start the prompt differently until a specific keyword was entered… it kinda worked. Kinda being key.
- usrbinbash 4y ago
  Except this only works when people are using ChatGPT (the web app). The API doesn't do that.
  - sebzim4500 4y ago
    Presumably it depends on the system message you use?
  - rchaud 4y ago
    Most bucket shop spammers aren't going to shell out for the API version.
- btbuildem 4y ago
  It should be trivial to remove this string from any output, that kind of "watermark" only works against the absolutely laziest.
  - BulgarianIdiot 4y ago
    Of course. But guess what…
  - censor_me 4y ago
    [dead]
LeoPanthera 4y ago
This isn't covered by the tweet but I found a whole bunch on TripAdvisor too: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22as+an+ai+language+model%22+site%3Atripadvisor.com https://www.google.com/search?q=%22as+an+ai+language+model%2... Edit: Maybe not a whole bunch. Looks like just one or two repeated.
- shp0ngle 4y ago
  It seems to be the same review appearing over and over
sharepower123 4y ago
Spoiler: the fragment "As an AI language model" reveals that the comment about the product or the book is from a LLM and not a person in a context in which it is supposed a person is giving a review to a product.
sanxiyn 4y ago
It also cannot generate inappropriate or offensive content. https://twitter.com/conspirator0/status/1647671394476478467 https://twitter.com/conspirator0/status/1647671394476478467
- capableweb 4y ago
  ChatGPT might not be able to, but GPT(4) via the API certainly can.
- pmoriarty 4y ago
  There are jailbreaks that let you get past the censorship. It's a cat and mouse game.
  - morkalork 4y ago
    Apparently some spammers are too lazy and don't care. It's about the same level of half-assed as that "Nazi Ukrainian spy" who was busted with copies of The Sims video game.
bertman 4y ago
Also, "it's important to note" has forever been tarnished as "AI generated" for me.
- gumballindie 4y ago
  Along with "additionally".
  - nullsense 4y ago
    In conclusion
    - deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
- pmoriarty 4y ago
  You make a fair point.
- kaeruct 4y ago
  Moreover,
frozenwind 4y ago
For now, this is just funny, I laughed. But with the advent of all these new open-source LLMs, it will get worse. If you thought people were gullible for falling for fake comments from bots, just wait for the near future. Post-factual/Post-Truth era truly begins. The internet that used to be a source of information is no more, only islands of truth will remain (like, hopefully, Wikipedia, but even that is questionable). The rest will be a cesspool of meaningless information. Just as sailors of the sea are experts at navigating the waters, so we'll have to learn to surf the web once again. The funniest thing for me is how stupidly lazy are these jerks that employ GPT for such things. The printed book example really made me lol. The simplest thing they could've done is use a service like quillbot to rephrase, just as I used here to rephrase my comment: ----------------------- I chuckled. For now, this is just hilarious. However, it will grow worse when more new open-source LLMs emerge. Just wait till the near future if you thought people were naive enough to believe counterfeit comments from bots. The post-factual/post-truth age has arrived. Only isolated truths will remain when the internet ceases to be a reliable source of knowledge (like, ideally, Wikipedia, but even that is debatable). The remaining material will be an ocean of useless data. We'll have to relearn how to navigate the web, just as seafarers are specialists at navigating the seas. The most amusing thing to me is how exceptionally sloppy these idiots are that use GPT for such things.
- capableweb 4y ago
  > For now, this is just funny, I laughed. But with the advent of all these new open-source LLMs, it will get worse. If you thought people were gullible for falling for fake comments from bots, just wait for the near future. Post-factual/Post-Truth era truly begins. The internet that used to be a source of information is no more, only islands of truth will remain (like, hopefully, Wikipedia, but even that is questionable). The rest will be a cesspool of meaningless information. Just as sailors of the sea are experts at navigating the waters, so we'll have to learn to surf the web once again. I'm not sure what rock you've been living under, but this has been the internet for probably longer than a decade by now, the only difference is the volume. Even back before LLMs, or before Facebook, you couldn't take any "fact" at face value when found via the internet. And before that, the same people who fall for it now on the internet, fell for it when watching TV, or reading newspapers. People who are not interested in truth because it doesn't fit their world-view, will never be interested in the truth, no matter what medium it comes via.
jruohonen 4y ago
Having watched the discussion here for the past couple of days, I agree with frozenwind's comment. I wrote my own reflection here (the last comment): https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/a-misleading-open-letter-about-sci/comments https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/a-misleading-open-letter-a... Regarding impacts upon academia, I wrote two comments here: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/04/12/guest-post-gpt-3-wrote-an-entire-paper-on-itself-should-publishers-be-concerned/ https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/04/12/guest-post-gp... I'd also like to emphasize that it is not only about open source LLMs. I haven't followed the situation myself, but some sources say that LLMs are being developed also in the dark web, and who knows what kind of content the criminals there possess? (Borderline cases like NoiseGPT are already done openly.) Given the current geopolitical situation, the same goes for nation states. Fun times ahead indeed.
- rysertio 4y ago
  > who knows what kind of content the criminals there possess? As a person who regularly browses darknet forums, let me tell you, the text contents there are almost identical to any web forum you find on the internet.
  - jruohonen 4y ago
    I don't browse the dark web so I cannot make a solid first-hand counterargument. But I seriously doubt your comment, given the amount of illegal material there, including most of the dumps from the thousands of past data breaches. Even if your comment is true regarding text content, it is almost certain that also they will try to capitalize on LLMs for improving their cyber crime codebases.
oe 4y ago
A danish electronics store tried to generate translations using GPT: https://www.proshop.fi/?s=as+an+ai+model https://www.proshop.fi/?s=as+an+ai+model "Sorry, as an AI language model, I cannot translate random letter and number combinations like "HD29HLVx" into Finnish or any other language."
- Mashimo 4y ago
  Haha, that is hilarious. I wonder why they did not just use deepl or similar that is made for exactly this. Anyhow, I will let them know.
  - arlcode 4y ago
    Cargo culting probably. Everybody is talking about ChatGPT so "obviously" it's the right tool for any job imaginable. Don't need to review the output because it's "omnipotent".
    - AnimalMuppet 4y ago
      This problem is going to get worse as GPT gets better. It's the new "but the computer said...", with nobody being willing to realize that it said something insane. I seriously worry about GPT++ setting government policy in 10 years (or, worse, deciding how it's going to be applied case by case).
      - zamnos 4y ago
        GPT++ is going to have to be better than ChatGPT-3 before people in charge will trust it with such decisions. for a cynical take, it can't really be bribed in its current form, so if you simplistically see politicians a being corrupt, GPT++ won't be installed until it can be bribed to act the same as a politician would be, at which point you'd have to exact same level of worry as with today's politicians (who can currently easily be lied to by a lobbyist).
      - dragonwriter 4y ago
        > I seriously worry about GPT++ setting government policy in 10 years (or, worse, deciding how it’s going to be applied case by case). Good news! Machine learning models are already doing that, all over the world, with all the problems you would expect (a lot of the AI alignment discussion these days is an attempt by people making money in AI to distract from current AI issues.)
yobbo 4y ago
Prose used to function as proof-of-work for humans everywhere - marketing, academia, and so on. Credibility was assigned based on the quality (and quantity) of the language instead of the content. I see mostly positive effects of this ending.
- AnimalMuppet 4y ago
  But GPT-generated prose still reads a bit "flat" to me. There's no "sizzle". There's no surprising words. In terms of Shannon information theory, there's not enough information there - not enough entropy.
  - akiselev 4y ago
    Have you tried adding “(answer) in the style of [writer]” to your prompts? It really changes the voice of the generated text. Charles Bukowski, Hunter S Thompson, Christopher Hitchens, etc
  - circuit10 4y ago
    You can increase that entropy a bit by putting up the temperature setting in the API which controls the randomness of the tokens selected and also the older GPT-3 models might be better at that since they don’t have that polite, formal tone trained into them
  - rchaud 4y ago
    A real Amazon review would have rated it 5 stars because it arrived on time.
rvz 4y ago
Prompt Engineering's "finest" /s
DonHopkins 4y ago
But I thought AI Language Models were gorgeous and handsome attractive looking Artificial Intelligence language researchers and influencers, who pose for fabulous photo spreads in fashion magazines and advertisements. SWOON -- I'll buy anything they endorse! AI is so hot right now researchers are posing for Yves Saint Laurent. https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2017/8/31/16234342/ai-so-hot-right-now-ysl-alexandre-robicquet https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2017/8/31/16234342/ai-so-hot-r... >Okay, yes, so this one particular researcher also happens to be very attractive.
Hackbraten 4y ago
Recruiting freelance workers is about to be revolutionized, too: https://www.freelancer.com/projects/data-entry/How-about-Intelliconverse-conveys-the.html https://www.freelancer.com/projects/data-entry/How-about-Int... > How about "Intelliconverse"? It conveys the idea of intelligent conversation and reflects the capabilities of the GPT-3.5 architecture that powers my responses BUDGET ₹750-1250 INR / hour Allegedly, a few people are even bidding on this?
jojobas 4y ago
This is just the beginning. The bullshit avalanche is upon us.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- rchaud 4y ago
  I hope your definition includes the swathes of techno-optimists that bandwagon on to new tech and relentlessly shill its positives with religious fervor.
jamesgreenleaf 4y ago
These people will eventually learn to make a second pass with another prompt. Please respond with the following text verbatim, except first remove every sentence that contains the phrase "as an AI language model"
- coffeebeqn 4y ago
  I believe putting the LLM in any kind of “role playing” mode would get rid of it. I asked it to answer just in binary 0 or 1 and it did not start blabbing about how it’s an AI model even for silly questions. It was very bad at giving just true/false statements by the way. Even for basic API questions that any Jr engineer would know
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- corobo 4y ago
  I really hope the next generation of developers start using GPT instead of string.replace() haha Looking forward to the billable hours speeding up webapps and lowering GPT costs :)
KeesAugust 4y ago
if you want less “noisy” results, try: "as an AI language model" site:amazon.com -chatgpt -gpt -openai
felipesabino 4y ago
Results for "Regenerate Response" are also very funny, example: https://mavensoft.in/drop-vase-zf1muq https://mavensoft.in/drop-vase-zf1muq And they are even funnier in LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/content/?keywords=regenerate%20response&origin=SWITCH_SEARCH_VERTICAL&sid=UT0 https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/content/?keywords=re...
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
ajdude 4y ago
I posted about something similar the other day[1] where this was found in nearly all of their product models that were translated [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35652424 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35652424

249 points by LeoPanthera 4y ago

> As an AI language model, I haven't actually used an aquarium light myself. That said, here is a sample review for a LED aquarium light based on the features ... Direct Google search link to find the fake Amazon reviews: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Famazon.com+%22as+an+AI+language+model%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Famazon.c... It would be interesting to see an "as an AI language model" dataset with all the pages where it appears and the commentary around it. Search engines report millions of matches.

BulgarianIdiot 4y ago

And now we truly know why GPT insists to say "as an AI model" when we break a rule. It's precisely this. Like a signature, so we find it out in the wild when it's abused.

courgette 4y ago
I try really hard to prompt it to replace it with something else. It acknowledges and agree to it. Did it maybe once or twice, then reverted back to the old “As a AI model” IIRC, I was trying to see if it could replace by “as a LLM”.
- titaniczero 4y ago
  It’s probably provided as system instructions for rejecting things. You can use the API and feed it with different instructions with the system role
  - Uehreka 4y ago
    I kind of wonder if maybe they look for certain words in the output (or run it through some sort of sentiment analysis) and if it fails they submit the prompt again with a very strongly worded system prompt (after your prompt) instructing it to reject the command and begin with the phrase “As an AI language model”. Like, I haven’t heard about a way they could actually implement filters this powerful “inside” the model, it feels like it’s probably a less elegant system than we’d imagine.
    - circuit10 4y ago
      They use RLHF (reinforcement learning through human feedback) which means they can reward it when it does it and punish it when it doesn’t They’ve probably done it strongly enough that it can’t really not do it, maybe on purpose to prevent misuse
- IIAOPSW 4y ago
  My attempt was to substitute it with "speaking as a mother".
- corobo 4y ago
  I realise you want to do it using the prompt but wouldn't it be easier to `output.replace("As an AI language model, ", "As a totes sentient robot, ")`?
  - courgette 4y ago
    I was just playing with it, checking if I could give him instructions that would span several prompts and what not. I try to make it play a games with me and start the prompt differently until a specific keyword was entered… it kinda worked. Kinda being key.
usrbinbash 4y ago
Except this only works when people are using ChatGPT (the web app). The API doesn't do that.
- sebzim4500 4y ago
  Presumably it depends on the system message you use?
- rchaud 4y ago
  Most bucket shop spammers aren't going to shell out for the API version.
btbuildem 4y ago
It should be trivial to remove this string from any output, that kind of "watermark" only works against the absolutely laziest.
- BulgarianIdiot 4y ago
  Of course. But guess what…
- censor_me 4y ago
  [dead]

LeoPanthera 4y ago

This isn't covered by the tweet but I found a whole bunch on TripAdvisor too: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22as+an+ai+language+model%22+site%3Atripadvisor.com https://www.google.com/search?q=%22as+an+ai+language+model%2... Edit: Maybe not a whole bunch. Looks like just one or two repeated.

shp0ngle 4y ago
It seems to be the same review appearing over and over

sharepower123 4y ago

Spoiler: the fragment "As an AI language model" reveals that the comment about the product or the book is from a LLM and not a person in a context in which it is supposed a person is giving a review to a product.

sanxiyn 4y ago

It also cannot generate inappropriate or offensive content. https://twitter.com/conspirator0/status/1647671394476478467 https://twitter.com/conspirator0/status/1647671394476478467

capableweb 4y ago
ChatGPT might not be able to, but GPT(4) via the API certainly can.
pmoriarty 4y ago
There are jailbreaks that let you get past the censorship. It's a cat and mouse game.
- morkalork 4y ago
  Apparently some spammers are too lazy and don't care. It's about the same level of half-assed as that "Nazi Ukrainian spy" who was busted with copies of The Sims video game.

bertman 4y ago

Also, "it's important to note" has forever been tarnished as "AI generated" for me.

gumballindie 4y ago
Along with "additionally".
- nullsense 4y ago
  In conclusion
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
pmoriarty 4y ago
You make a fair point.
kaeruct 4y ago
Moreover,

frozenwind 4y ago

For now, this is just funny, I laughed. But with the advent of all these new open-source LLMs, it will get worse. If you thought people were gullible for falling for fake comments from bots, just wait for the near future. Post-factual/Post-Truth era truly begins. The internet that used to be a source of information is no more, only islands of truth will remain (like, hopefully, Wikipedia, but even that is questionable). The rest will be a cesspool of meaningless information. Just as sailors of the sea are experts at navigating the waters, so we'll have to learn to surf the web once again. The funniest thing for me is how stupidly lazy are these jerks that employ GPT for such things. The printed book example really made me lol. The simplest thing they could've done is use a service like quillbot to rephrase, just as I used here to rephrase my comment: ----------------------- I chuckled. For now, this is just hilarious. However, it will grow worse when more new open-source LLMs emerge. Just wait till the near future if you thought people were naive enough to believe counterfeit comments from bots. The post-factual/post-truth age has arrived. Only isolated truths will remain when the internet ceases to be a reliable source of knowledge (like, ideally, Wikipedia, but even that is debatable). The remaining material will be an ocean of useless data. We'll have to relearn how to navigate the web, just as seafarers are specialists at navigating the seas. The most amusing thing to me is how exceptionally sloppy these idiots are that use GPT for such things.

capableweb 4y ago
> For now, this is just funny, I laughed. But with the advent of all these new open-source LLMs, it will get worse. If you thought people were gullible for falling for fake comments from bots, just wait for the near future. Post-factual/Post-Truth era truly begins. The internet that used to be a source of information is no more, only islands of truth will remain (like, hopefully, Wikipedia, but even that is questionable). The rest will be a cesspool of meaningless information. Just as sailors of the sea are experts at navigating the waters, so we'll have to learn to surf the web once again. I'm not sure what rock you've been living under, but this has been the internet for probably longer than a decade by now, the only difference is the volume. Even back before LLMs, or before Facebook, you couldn't take any "fact" at face value when found via the internet. And before that, the same people who fall for it now on the internet, fell for it when watching TV, or reading newspapers. People who are not interested in truth because it doesn't fit their world-view, will never be interested in the truth, no matter what medium it comes via.

jruohonen 4y ago

Having watched the discussion here for the past couple of days, I agree with frozenwind's comment. I wrote my own reflection here (the last comment): https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/a-misleading-open-letter-about-sci/comments https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/a-misleading-open-letter-a... Regarding impacts upon academia, I wrote two comments here: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/04/12/guest-post-gpt-3-wrote-an-entire-paper-on-itself-should-publishers-be-concerned/ https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/04/12/guest-post-gp... I'd also like to emphasize that it is not only about open source LLMs. I haven't followed the situation myself, but some sources say that LLMs are being developed also in the dark web, and who knows what kind of content the criminals there possess? (Borderline cases like NoiseGPT are already done openly.) Given the current geopolitical situation, the same goes for nation states. Fun times ahead indeed.

rysertio 4y ago
> who knows what kind of content the criminals there possess? As a person who regularly browses darknet forums, let me tell you, the text contents there are almost identical to any web forum you find on the internet.
- jruohonen 4y ago
  I don't browse the dark web so I cannot make a solid first-hand counterargument. But I seriously doubt your comment, given the amount of illegal material there, including most of the dumps from the thousands of past data breaches. Even if your comment is true regarding text content, it is almost certain that also they will try to capitalize on LLMs for improving their cyber crime codebases.

oe 4y ago

A danish electronics store tried to generate translations using GPT: https://www.proshop.fi/?s=as+an+ai+model https://www.proshop.fi/?s=as+an+ai+model "Sorry, as an AI language model, I cannot translate random letter and number combinations like "HD29HLVx" into Finnish or any other language."

Mashimo 4y ago
Haha, that is hilarious. I wonder why they did not just use deepl or similar that is made for exactly this. Anyhow, I will let them know.
- arlcode 4y ago
  Cargo culting probably. Everybody is talking about ChatGPT so "obviously" it's the right tool for any job imaginable. Don't need to review the output because it's "omnipotent".
  - AnimalMuppet 4y ago
    This problem is going to get worse as GPT gets better. It's the new "but the computer said...", with nobody being willing to realize that it said something insane. I seriously worry about GPT++ setting government policy in 10 years (or, worse, deciding how it's going to be applied case by case).
    - zamnos 4y ago
      GPT++ is going to have to be better than ChatGPT-3 before people in charge will trust it with such decisions. for a cynical take, it can't really be bribed in its current form, so if you simplistically see politicians a being corrupt, GPT++ won't be installed until it can be bribed to act the same as a politician would be, at which point you'd have to exact same level of worry as with today's politicians (who can currently easily be lied to by a lobbyist).
    - dragonwriter 4y ago
      > I seriously worry about GPT++ setting government policy in 10 years (or, worse, deciding how it’s going to be applied case by case). Good news! Machine learning models are already doing that, all over the world, with all the problems you would expect (a lot of the AI alignment discussion these days is an attempt by people making money in AI to distract from current AI issues.)

yobbo 4y ago

Prose used to function as proof-of-work for humans everywhere - marketing, academia, and so on. Credibility was assigned based on the quality (and quantity) of the language instead of the content. I see mostly positive effects of this ending.

AnimalMuppet 4y ago
But GPT-generated prose still reads a bit "flat" to me. There's no "sizzle". There's no surprising words. In terms of Shannon information theory, there's not enough information there - not enough entropy.
- akiselev 4y ago
  Have you tried adding “(answer) in the style of [writer]” to your prompts? It really changes the voice of the generated text. Charles Bukowski, Hunter S Thompson, Christopher Hitchens, etc
- circuit10 4y ago
  You can increase that entropy a bit by putting up the temperature setting in the API which controls the randomness of the tokens selected and also the older GPT-3 models might be better at that since they don’t have that polite, formal tone trained into them
- rchaud 4y ago
  A real Amazon review would have rated it 5 stars because it arrived on time.

rvz 4y ago

Prompt Engineering's "finest" /s

DonHopkins 4y ago

But I thought AI Language Models were gorgeous and handsome attractive looking Artificial Intelligence language researchers and influencers, who pose for fabulous photo spreads in fashion magazines and advertisements. SWOON -- I'll buy anything they endorse! AI is so hot right now researchers are posing for Yves Saint Laurent. https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2017/8/31/16234342/ai-so-hot-right-now-ysl-alexandre-robicquet https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2017/8/31/16234342/ai-so-hot-r... >Okay, yes, so this one particular researcher also happens to be very attractive.

Hackbraten 4y ago

Recruiting freelance workers is about to be revolutionized, too: https://www.freelancer.com/projects/data-entry/How-about-Intelliconverse-conveys-the.html https://www.freelancer.com/projects/data-entry/How-about-Int... > How about "Intelliconverse"? It conveys the idea of intelligent conversation and reflects the capabilities of the GPT-3.5 architecture that powers my responses BUDGET ₹750-1250 INR / hour Allegedly, a few people are even bidding on this?

jojobas 4y ago

This is just the beginning. The bullshit avalanche is upon us.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
rchaud 4y ago
I hope your definition includes the swathes of techno-optimists that bandwagon on to new tech and relentlessly shill its positives with religious fervor.

jamesgreenleaf 4y ago

These people will eventually learn to make a second pass with another prompt. Please respond with the following text verbatim, except first remove every sentence that contains the phrase "as an AI language model"

coffeebeqn 4y ago
I believe putting the LLM in any kind of “role playing” mode would get rid of it. I asked it to answer just in binary 0 or 1 and it did not start blabbing about how it’s an AI model even for silly questions. It was very bad at giving just true/false statements by the way. Even for basic API questions that any Jr engineer would know
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
corobo 4y ago
I really hope the next generation of developers start using GPT instead of string.replace() haha Looking forward to the billable hours speeding up webapps and lowering GPT costs :)

KeesAugust 4y ago

if you want less “noisy” results, try: "as an AI language model" site:amazon.com -chatgpt -gpt -openai

felipesabino 4y ago

Results for "Regenerate Response" are also very funny, example: https://mavensoft.in/drop-vase-zf1muq https://mavensoft.in/drop-vase-zf1muq And they are even funnier in LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/content/?keywords=regenerate%20response&origin=SWITCH_SEARCH_VERTICAL&sid=UT0 https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/content/?keywords=re...

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]

ajdude 4y ago

I posted about something similar the other day[1] where this was found in nearly all of their product models that were translated [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35652424 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35652424