3 ms·
This is why the position of Bing annoys me. Nobody checks the content and just assumes. Quidco is not a scam and my article describes how to get what you deserv
by idarek 3y ago
This is why the position of Bing annoys me. Nobody checks the content and just assumes. Quidco is not a scam and my article describes how to get what you deserve. Quidco is nothing different to coupons for loyalty programs given to customers.
- mise_en_place 3y agoI can understand your frustration. These days an LLM can arbitrarily blackhole you, effectively becoming judge jury and executioner. You cannot even reverse the mistake, it’s all automated and Orwellian.
- pixl97 3y agoI don't think Orwellian is the right word here. This makes it sound like is a system that has malicious intent against you. I don't think that is the case here... Human systems were never designed to be as inner connected as they are now. I'm not talking about computer networks, I'm talking about our social systems and things like dunbars number. How do you codify one cultures social expectations in a system that works over the world wide web? How do you design a system that can be attacked by anywhere in the world at any time? If you're connected, you have one degree of separation to everyone else. A system like this will experience such a huge amount of bullshit asymmetry that the cost of electricity and bandwidth to determine your truthiness quotient is a significant operating cost. The first moment any deviance is detected in your response you will be banned simply because the system cannot afford to do otherwise.
- dmix 3y agoIt doesn't even matter what the content says anyway (and I personally wasn't going to read a full article I was just curious about cashback schemes), the search spam systems will always be automated and lack wider context.