3 ms·

I don't know why you say that C is bad for exercising error conditions or fuzzing. In my experience, it's the best at those.

• tialaramex 4y ago
  It doesn't come with either capability, so you're adding third party tooling to get these working.
  • gavinhoward 4y ago
    Well, sure, but that's true of any language.
    • tialaramex 4y ago
      Nope, when I write tests in my Rust the out of box cargo test will check those tests pass. If I wrote inline Markdown documentation for part of the Rust code with an example, cargo test will try to build my example, and check it works - not much good having a purported "example" which doesn't even work, is it? And yet many languages don't do this.
      • gavinhoward 4y ago
        You said fuzzing and exercising error conditions. Rust's tooling does not do that. You need something to generate those tests. Fuzzing is still not part of the default Rust tooling.
      • GoblinSlayer 4y ago
        Mere existence of a test runner is infinitesimal compared to your proposed careful testing. Saying this as someone who wrote my own test runner, it's a few lines of code.