> But then why “20 years”? Would performance at the level of a 30-year professional be considered failure? They're keeping the "30 years of experience" agent f

> But then why “20 years”? Would performance at the level of a 30-year professional be considered failure? They're keeping the "30 years of experience" agent for the 2.0 version /s. This is a good analysis, and I'm glad that there are some people like you giving these things a good deal of thought.