> Might be they'll replace actual websites with Google own version to keep people in Google controlled ecosystem? This just shows that you don't understand AMP

> Might be they'll replace actual websites with Google own version to keep people in Google controlled ecosystem? This just shows that you don't understand AMP. Apple News replaces websites with only Apple News. AMP allows anybody to host the article. > Or change APIs in their own nearly-monopolistic browser to make ad-blockers less efficient. Only one browser has done this so far. It's Safari. Google might not be a good actor, but trading it for a worse actor who won't let you use any other web clients is just cutting off your nose to spite your face.