3 ms·
While that does sort of happen, that's not the reason. Article says it was used in satellite links and deep space networks before it was cool. Those applicatio
by nunuvit 3y ago
While that does sort of happen, that's not the reason.
Article says it was used in satellite links and deep space networks before it was cool. Those applications had hit their technological limits and no one was making something new they could buy next year, so they had to do it themselves.
Contrast that with phone networks being able to rely on the next G coming out. Now we have 5G, but it's 5G with an asterisk, so it's time to look for a new approach.
Same with Moore's law. The semiconductor industry was really focused on smaller transistors for a long time until they started getting close to the physical limit. Then suddenly everyone is talking about chiplets and other ideas that had been around a long time but weren't mainstream.
Changing approach requires a lot of coordination and carries a lot of risk. It's easier to finish milking one cow for as long as possible before moving on to the next. The laughing is just because your advisor knows how long it will probably be before the general market has exhausted its old approach.
- taneq 3y agoYep, as in all things, we do the easy thing until it stops working. Only then is it worth putting more work into harder things. I’m not deriding this approach, mind you. It’s efficient. Edit: Also the incremental improvement over the current system needs not only to be big enough that it outweighs the cost of the changeover (including hidden costs like risks and opportunity cost), but also to be big enough to bother with in absolute terms. Things like zip, mp3 and jpg are good enough that even though there are now alternatives that are better by any reasonable metric, for most users it's just not worth the bother of changing over.