3 ms·

I don't think any version of ubuntu meets the criteria. Ubuntu has a really persistent update mechaism built in. Arch derived distos would be good, updates ar

by johnea 4y ago

I don't think any version of ubuntu meets the criteria. Ubuntu has a really persistent update mechaism built in. Arch derived distos would be good, updates are only when you manually run them... I use arch + fluxbox and I've been able to move my configuration from computer to computer by simply copying my home directory. When the new computer boots, I have the exact same desktop environment that I prefer. It only changes when I change it.

cjbprime 4y ago
> Ubuntu has a really persistent update mechaism built in. The OP doesn't object to updates, but to unexpected breaking changes, where th change is caused by different design decisions rather than bugs. LTS releases should not have those.
- thrwwy_grump 4y ago
  No, I specifically object to updates, because in my experience you cannot separate one from the other. I don't want any updates that I don't have reason for... if there's new feature or better performance I don't care about them 99% of the time. If I care after research, I can install myself.