I think the notion is that the company has zero interest in the well being of the land because they have no ties to it. That does have some logic, similar to o

I think the notion is that the company has zero interest in the well being of the land because they have no ties to it. That does have some logic, similar to out of state landlords or corporate landlords milking a property for as much rent with absolute minimal upkeep as they have no involvement in the community. A flaw with that argument with the foreign water exporters and also with the landlord is that local landlords or businesses also can be equally bad. But still, there is some sense to it and may have some truth if the average behaviors were quantified