I think there is too little oversight on animal testing and that this experiment is a flagrant example of that. While I understand that some experiment "require

I think there is too little oversight on animal testing and that this experiment is a flagrant example of that. While I understand that some experiment "require" animal testing, I don't see how this one arguably does. That's not been argued, we're arguing the salaries of the scientists instead - not certain why. I haven't talked abount embezzeling anything or that experiments are useless - just that I can't see why this one was done, and it makes me weary of most experiments on animals, even more than I normaly am, as they seem much more arbitrary than I would have liked to think. Thanks for your insight and snarkiness anyway.