4 ms·
Exactly. I think that's a very reasonable posture. At the end of the day, the whole deal over sideloading was about not being forced to use Apple's services, n
by EMIRELADERO 4y ago
Exactly. I think that's a very reasonable posture.
At the end of the day, the whole deal over sideloading was about not being forced to use Apple's services, not to use them for free.
- DaiPlusPlus 4y agoI want sideloading because I want to run a GameBoy emulator on my iPhone. Not because I don’t want to be forced to use the App Store (though I don’t want that either). The demand for sideloading is two-pronged: devs want sideloading because Apple’s App Store policies are unnecessarily restrictive in some ways (e.g. private APIs) and capriciously enforced; end-users want sideloading because the single App Store fundamentally restricts choice and end-user freedoms (if you want an App that necessarily needs to use a private API or, say, a first-party PornHub app, then you’re 100% SOL without jailbreaking or using dev/corp sideloading). Actually I’m curious how Apple’s EU sideloading will compare to the existing dev/corp sideloading system: e.g. https://osxdaily.com/2016/01/12/howto-sideload-apps-iphone-ipad-xcode/ https://osxdaily.com/2016/01/12/howto-sideload-apps-iphone-i...