3 ms·
It's true, not necessarily, but it's a real possibility, and I think that's kind of what we're aiming for, isn't it?
by alwaysbeconsing 3y ago
It's true, not necessarily, but it's a real possibility, and I think that's kind of what we're aiming for, isn't it?
- brucethemoose2 3y agoI'm pretty sure the richest AI builders (Facebook, Microsoft, Google, nation states and such) are actually aiming for AGI along the lines of the blogpost.
- ok_dad 3y agoI don't think the rich and powerful will fund an AGI that has free thought and free initiative, but perhaps some other group will. The point of AGI, from what I can see, is to replace humans with reliable machines, so that they can do away with humans.
- alwaysbeconsing 3y agoI guess I'm skeptical that a truly General AI could be constructed that didn't have those things. It seems like a fundamental contradiction to me. I don't think an intelligence could make complex good choices without understanding what the bad choices are, and to understand them I think they have to be possible.